Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SierraWasp; tubebender; Carry_Okie; NormsRevenge; Shermy; Ernest_at_the_Beach

Celebration may be premature.

From my post yesterday: “At first I thought this was good news. Further googling shows that the case was brought by a bunch of environmental loons (operating under the name “Association of Irritated Residents”) who seem driven to put California out of business altogether. Heaven forbid that the “trade” part of cap-and-trade would allow some of those evil greenhouse gas ‘polluters’ to still operate in California. They think California should be required to meet all of the stricter emission standards post-haste, not be able to reduce emissions in timbuktoo for exchange.”

The judge took exception to the ‘trade’ part of cap-and-trade. I’m not so sure he took exception to the ‘cap’ part, at all. I haven’t had time to read the court ruling, though.


22 posted on 02/04/2011 12:55:50 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Sapere Aude!" --Immanuel Kant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl

Looks more like a delaying action , a ‘technicality’ of the law.. sad ..

We need to smack this crapoliticque down once and for all.


23 posted on 02/04/2011 1:34:27 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson