I find it hard to believe that either Wilson or FDR had the true interests of the United States at heart.
If you note, I made no allegations as to him relocating the carriers. That’s entirely your argument. I don’t believe he willingly sacrificed American troops at Pearl Harbour. That was all the Japanese initiative. However the reluctance to enter the war in Europe until after Barbarossa, indicates to me that FDR cared more about Stalin than he did for Churchill and the British. Which is backed up by Yalta.
Do you know how many millions of people that the US condemned to Communism at Yalta? People who are just now getting their freedom. 60 years later.
“I find it hard to believe that either Wilson or FDR had the true interests of the United States at heart.”
I find it hard to believe George W. Bush had the best interests of the U.S. at heart, therefore he planned 9/11.
“That’s entirely your argument.”
Not really. Or, rather, only part of my argument. Either you are a conspiracy theorists and my mention of Pearl Harbor would bring it out in the open, or you aren’t, in which case my mention of Pearl Harbor ought to cast serious doubt on whether we went to war to protect the Russians.
“I don’t believe he willingly sacrificed American troops at Pearl Harbour. That was all the Japanese initiative. However the reluctance to enter the war in Europe until after Barbarossa, indicates to me that FDR cared more about Stalin than he did for Churchill and the British.”
Why does it indicate that? Wouldn’t it be infinitely more likely he went to war in Germany because the Japanese gave him the excuse he had been looking for? Oh, and because Germany declared war on us?
“Do you know how many millions of people that the US condemned to Communism at Yalta?”
None. We didn’t help their cause, but the commies still would’ve been there whether or not we officially recognized it. You can argue the agreement paved the way for further commie incursion in Asia, but as it turns out the A-bomb made that moot point.