Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharacterCounts

And still, the judge’s authority only extends to the matters before him. No one says that in making that decision no reference can be made to precedent, or to the common law. Or that other judges can’t reference his decision in this particular case in the future.

But you know as well as I do that the application of precedent in the real world is arbitrary and capricious. When they want to apply it, they do. When they don’t want to, they don’t.

Or, maybe I’m missing your point. Correct me if I am, please.


100 posted on 02/04/2011 6:36:30 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Is a child a person? Of course. Which is why we MUST ban abortion NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

We explicitly adopted the English common law system which had a long history of precedent which applies to all civil cases. So, when an appeals court makes a ruling, the ruling is precedent for all subsequent cases coming through courts under the jurisdiction of that court.


113 posted on 02/04/2011 7:07:36 AM PST by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson