Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/03/2011 2:37:13 PM PST by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ooh-Ah

I do not believe the spin. I believe we need Mubarak to win. This revolt is an Obamascam. I think Obama is in on it.


2 posted on 02/03/2011 2:41:25 PM PST by screaminsunshine (Surfers Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ooh-Ah

Wasn’t Carney the kicker for the Chargers and the Saints?


3 posted on 02/03/2011 2:45:14 PM PST by BrewingFrog (I brew, therefore I am!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ooh-Ah
This is the core truth, the core issue and the core of the problem, a problem Mubarak helped create:

"The terrible legacy of more than twenty years of his rule lies in two aspects:...

...what he has done—give a much freer rein to Islamists in the public, academic, corporate, religious and intellectual spheres while ruthlessly repressing Islamists when they use violence [my editorial addition: as well as suppressing them, along with everyone else, politically] —which has demoralized, subverted and rotted Egyptian society and public life—...

...and what he has not done — devoting the country’s resources and energy to economic growth, investment, infrastructure, education, etc. Egypt is overwhelmed by its demographic growth. It has become a Malthusian basket case.

The Egyptian Islamists were allowed a large and prominent PUBLIC voice - much more so than any other political opposition - even while they were politically suppressed like everyone else.

Just like the Saudi princes and their Wahabi clerics, that policy, allowing them prominent presence in academia and the media - was done to placate the fundamentalists. It doesn't; and it didn't.

It was a policy that HELPED the public strength of the Islamists grow because they were allowed to be very public and they could be identified in the public mind as part of those "opposed to oppression" (it could mean "Jews" and it could mean Mubarak as well), "siding with the oppressed" (it could mean "Palestinians" and it could mean suppressed Egyptian political forces as well} and "PART OF the politically disenfranchised" [known to be frozen out of a political role, like all political opposition].

While Mubarak kept them - the MB - out of government, he allowed them enough public voice to grow their "street creds" with average Egyptians. The size of their public voice was one secular democratic moderates envied and never had. It was a big mistake.

6 posted on 02/03/2011 3:52:59 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ooh-Ah

So, in retrospect we find the simple genius?


7 posted on 02/03/2011 4:02:51 PM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson