Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Golden State: Everybody Must Get Stoned
biggovernment.com ^ | 02/02/2011 | Adam Sparks

Posted on 02/02/2011 5:22:13 PM PST by sfwarrior

From Bob Dylan’s lyrics to a real California workplace policy, progress is being made. Despite an economy on life support with only weeks, if not hours, remaining to survive fiscally before the State Treasurer of California begins issuing IOU’s for payments, legislators have come up with a plan. Their plan is now to force employers to accept employees who come to work stoned. This should really help light-up the ailing economy. It may sound like a joke, but it’s serious.

A state lawmaker in California, during the nation’s worst recession, wants to outlaw employers from firing workers who come to work stoned. Isn’t that special?

(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: bloggers; calegislation; california; jobs; markleno; medicalmarijuana
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: sfwarrior

And Jeb Bush, Newt Gingrich, and Dick Morris are advocating the States like California should have the right to declare bankruptcy so they can stick it to the bond holders and tax payers while they protect the drugged out public union employees.

Jeb Bush, Newt Gingrich, and Dick Morris need to be taken behind the woodshed.


21 posted on 02/02/2011 6:48:12 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sfwarrior

If you smoke just before you go to work, you show up intoxicated, and you can be canned for that.

But if you fail a dope test (showing up for work unintoxicated) yet have one of the 33 million scripts for medical dope, you can’t be fired.

The thread article gets it wrong- show up zapped you get zotted.

Either way it’s not good, it is difficult to prove on the job intoxication if a pee test is the proof and 33 million of the 32 million in CA have a doctor scrip for pot.

Personally, I got mine by telling the doc I did not cough enouhg, he wrote it right up (j/k).


22 posted on 02/02/2011 6:54:11 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sfwarrior

Here’s the words of the bill’s sponsor:

The Supreme Court case upheld the firing of a Carmichael man who was dismissed after failing a drug test as a condition of employment at a Sacramento firm, RagingWire Telecommunications. Ross had told his employer that he had a medical recommendation for back pain and spasms from injuries suffered in the U.S. Air Force.

Leno charged that the court’s interpretation effectively said that California voters had approved the legal use of medical marijuana only “to benefit unemployed people.” He said his bill will put it into law that “a medical marijuana patient has a right to employment in California.”

So if the worker tests positive for marijuana, you can’t fire him. That’s the problem. Few employers want drug addled workers, and getting them fired if they’re med marijuana patients if they’re impaired is inviting a major lawsuit that few small business can afford. The alternative, keep the druggie on the payroll


23 posted on 02/02/2011 6:56:40 PM PST by sfwarrior (Never Forget The Fallen Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sfwarrior

Forgot- the pot “clinics” offer lots of products you don’t smoke, cookies,candies, butter, and stuff like that. For medical patients who don’t smoke (or who go to concerts at the Forum where smoking is not allowed).


24 posted on 02/02/2011 6:56:49 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sfwarrior
Uh, but what about the companies who will FIRE you or not hire you if you use tobacco? I'd rather have my kids driven around by a school bus driver who smokes a pack a day than some stoned out off his gourd pothead.

I love the defenses:"But pot doesn't affect you, it's safe" If it "doesn't do anything", then why smoke it?

25 posted on 02/02/2011 7:10:07 PM PST by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Bill, I think you’re right.

How about a tsunami or nuts chewing rats?


26 posted on 02/02/2011 7:10:54 PM PST by sergeantdave (The democrat party is a seditious organization and must be outlawed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sfwarrior

You think service is bad now....


27 posted on 02/02/2011 7:47:59 PM PST by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson