Really?
http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/05/autism.vaccines/
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/13/opinion/13thu2.html?_r=1
Would you care to furnish us with the link that documents the fact that this information has been discredited?
Especially your comments on this:
But the investigation discovered that, while Wakefield held himself out to be a dispassionate scientist, two years before the Lancet paper was published - and before any of the 12 children were even referred to the hospital - he had been hired to attack MMR by a lawyer, Richard Barr: a jobbing solicitor in the small eastern English town of King’s Lynn, who hoped to raise a speculative class action lawsuit against drug companies which manufactured the shot.
From:
http://briandeer.com/mmr/lancet-summary.htm
>> “Would you care to furnish us with the link that documents the fact that this information has been discredited?” <<
.
All you had to do was read the links that I posted.
The crap has been exposed.
When a scientist is hired due to his expertise, it does not discredit his work, it glorifies it.
Their attempt was completely dishonest, and aimed at the general low level of understanding among the general public. IOW a smoke screen.