Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Balding_Eagle

Yes, if they cannot use their product and keep their pollution on their land (pollution in the sense that it is a byproduct of the process they are using) then they should not use it.

When a painter paints a home with a portable sprayed, if the neighbor’s home is speckled with paint, it is not that homeowners’s issue, it is the painters problem to take responsiblity for.


228 posted on 02/03/2011 11:53:10 AM PST by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: padre35
if they cannot use their product and keep their pollution on their land (pollution in the sense that it is a byproduct of the process they are using) then they should not use it.

That elimates every step in the crop production, from tillage, to harvest. It also elimates NOT doing anything with the land. It also elimates every step in animal production.

I pointed out upthread that I think you don't even know a farmer, now I'll bet you haven't even been on a farm.

230 posted on 02/03/2011 12:32:54 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson