Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dmz
I never said that, nor is federal law (including the constitution) all that is relevant - state law (and the SD constitution) is as well.
Own, possess, yes. Buy? Not in Article 1 Section 8. That said, in 1792 (the founding generation) passed the militia act. That federal law said (in part).
"shall, within six months thereafter, provide himself with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet"
States laws are going to say whatever they say, and as long as consistent with the federal and state constitutions, they are plainly enforceable.

73 posted on 02/01/2011 10:50:48 AM PST by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: RKV

Sorry, my use of the word ‘buy’ was unfortunate. Procure, possess, whatever word choice works better than buy I’m OK with. But it does not change the text in section 8, wherein the fed will arm the militia (unless you have some other way of interpreting “To provide for the organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia).


75 posted on 02/01/2011 10:57:16 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson