Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paladin1_dcs

To force me to buy a gun and learn how to use it might go against my religion and my right to protect myself as I see fit, which doesn’t involve a gun. So, that law would be a violation of my constitutional rights because the individual State is circumventing those rights. Another example: Most airports are on land owned by local govts. How does TSA have jurisdiction to demand that I submit to their invasive search procedures? Why isn’t my state protecting me from the feds on things that really matter (unreasonable search)? The tangled web of federal and state/local mandates and rights of the people are bound to collide soon.


102 posted on 02/01/2011 12:41:33 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Sioux-san
To force me to buy a gun and learn how to use it might go against my religion and my right to protect myself as I see fit, which doesn’t involve a gun.

BS. The Law says nothing forcing you to USE that gun on anyone. As far as I know there does not exist any religion where you are not allowed to have an unloaded gun locked in a drawer some where.
105 posted on 02/01/2011 12:52:01 PM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Sioux-san

The founding generation passed a law in 1792 requiring all able-bodied male citizens to possess militia arms. There were no religious exemptions in that law. Putting your butt on the line was the price of being a citizen. I suspect strongly that they knew what the Constitution said. Certainly better than some here at FR.


108 posted on 02/01/2011 12:58:42 PM PST by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson