Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Green Chemistry' is California's new job-killer
Washington Examiner.com ^ | January 31,2011 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 01/31/2011 6:14:57 AM PST by Hojczyk

"Green chemistry" isn't just a slogan. It is a full employment concept for government regulators and private-sector lawyers that will have the effect of costing American business billions even as it produces minimal benefits for consumers. Just like "global warming" and "clean energy," "green chemistry" is a phrase containing worlds within it, almost all of them dangerous or downright deadly to market-driven innovation and productivity. We are entering the third decade of the "green chemistry" movement, and a handy guide to its history is in Katharine Sanderson's article in the Jan. 6 issue of Nature.

The would-be regulators of all chemistry have not had an easy time of it these past 20 years. Anderson quotes a proponent of the movement as telling her that "a mention of green chemistry in a gathering of chemists can still provoke sighs and eye-rolling."

Among government bureaucrats eager to expand their regulatory reach, however, that mention is likely to produce clasped and rubbing hands, while manufacturing executives reach for the aspirin and their lawyers reach for the time sheets. "Green chemistry" got a toehold in California and from there will climb its way on to the backs of the rest of America.

Then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a pair of bills into law in September 2008 that together are known as California's "Green Chemistry Initiative." In June of last year, California's Department of Toxic Substances Control released a draft set of regulations that according to the department "sets forth a process for the design of safer products," while creating "a systematic, science-based process to evaluate chemicals of concern in products." The regulations mandated that "manufacturers seek safer alternatives to toxic chemicals in their products, and create tough governmental responses for lack of compliance."

The proposed rules were then massaged and reworked, and when the 92-page final set of commands was issued in November, the "green community" was disappointed with the "green initiative," and demanded a rewrite with tougher requirements.

In late December, Team Arnold caved and postponed issuance of the new regs, saying in a letter to the key legislator, California Assemblyman Mike Feuer, that the department "has agreed to take additional time to be responsive to the concerns raised and revisit the proposed regulations."

Now the new governor, Jerry Brown, will superintend the rules that almost certainly will mandate testing and labeling changes on tens of thousands of products and almost certainly trigger a new generation of product recalls.

"Take the most onerous regulatory regimes you have heard of," Liz McNulty, one of my law partners, told me, "like those associated with the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act or the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act."

"Take whatever you think is the worst regulatory regime out there, and expand it exponentially," she continued, "and then you get a glimpse of what is coming to California."

McNulty is already a guru on California's costly Proposition 65, which spawned a million useless warning signs around the state, but now her office light is on late figuring out what California will do next to manufacturers.

With taxes already sky-high and the regulatory environment among the worst in the nation, some manufacturers will simply join the exodus of job creators to Texas and elsewhere. But the long arm of California's regulatory zealots won't let them go at the state border -- not if their products are going to circulate in the Golden State.

For a state with 12 percent unemployment, the zeal for new job-killing laws and rules seems insane, but proponents have told themselves the new dictates are "technology-forcing" and thus job creators.

California has had two decades of such "job creators," and the consequences are obvious. A dead economy is apparently also a "green economy."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: climatechange; globalwarming; greenchemistry; gw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: lacrew
A few tablespoons of that added to the dishwasher with each load,

A few tablespoons seems like a lot. My dishwasher ( a Maytag) has a fairly small area in which to put the soap. Do you know of any "recipes" for adding TSP to dishwashing soap powder?

21 posted on 01/31/2011 8:18:20 AM PST by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
"Green chemistry" got a toehold in California and from there will climb its way on to the backs of the rest of America. Then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a pair of bills into law in September 2008 that together are known as California's "Green Chemistry Initiative."

I warned FReepers about what electing Arnold would bring with his environmental policy. For the most part, they did not listen.

An Analysis of Arnold Schwarzenegger's Environmental Policy

22 posted on 01/31/2011 8:23:53 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Amen, Bro! Folks were warned,, but didn’t listen or didn’t care to think for themselves. The Q Factor and the ‘Promise of Victory’ blinded them.

Tonight’s speech is worthy of a Green Projectile Vomit Alert!!


23 posted on 01/31/2011 9:33:27 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The Q Factor and the ‘Promise of Victory’ blinded them.

Bustamante, Bustamante, Bustamante, Bustamante, Bustamante...

He'd have been gone in two years, and we'd have elected a conservative.

24 posted on 01/31/2011 10:28:33 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

LED under cabinet lighting sells at Lowes home improvement for @ $157.00 vs $700.00 for common fluorescents from a lighting supplier.


25 posted on 01/31/2011 2:37:20 PM PST by 23 Everest (A gun in hand is better than a cop on the phone & easier to carry than a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk; Fractal Trader; FrPR; enough_idiocy; meyer; Normandy; Whenifhow; TenthAmendmentChampion; ..
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

26 posted on 01/31/2011 2:56:57 PM PST by steelyourfaith (ObamaCare Death Panels: a Final Solution to the looming Social Security crisis ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

“Can you use a bit of TSP in the clothes washer also?”

Yes.


27 posted on 01/31/2011 3:27:35 PM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree

“A few tablespoons seems like a lot. My dishwasher ( a Maytag) has a fairly small area in which to put the soap. Do you know of any “recipes” for adding TSP to dishwashing soap powder?”

I use liquid, so I’ve never tried that...and it seems like alot of work to actually mix the cleaners. Just trial by error - add a tablespoon at first, if that doesn’t do the job, add a little more next time.

Phosphates have been in dishwasher soap until recently. Around 10 years ago, various states started forbidding it, until last September, when all the major manufacturers said ‘screw it, we’re only having one formula’....and removed them. Looking at old packaging, it looks like they used around 7% by weight of phosphates, if that gives you a good starting point.

Anyway, if your dishes have a white film on them, and the glasses are especially spotted after going through the wash...adding Phosphate back in will have dramatic results.


28 posted on 01/31/2011 3:33:12 PM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

I checked the price of TSP when I was in Ace Hardware this afternoon and it was $10.50 for a 62oz tub. I have a large box of it in the shop from the days when we did a lot of painting but I am afraid it will soon be taken off the market...


29 posted on 01/31/2011 4:16:10 PM PST by tubebender (The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in Eureka...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson