[Hulka]

Yeah. . .and details would provide clues as to who and what programs, as well as expose others. . .obviously you REALLY need security training. . .you simply have no clue, as not all program are open source, and many open source programs have other aspects not to be exposed.

Are you really that simple that you don't understand this?

Are you really that dense that you can't see the issues?

Really?

And you are supposedly a DoS expert. . . so. . .either you are a) an expert and prove the point about DoS personnel being totally in a world of their own that doesn't care a wit about US national security, or b) you are no expert and a TROLL. Hmm. . .tough one--not!

Reply with your usual childish snit, and I know you must, as children like you do have their precious egos to protect. So reply and prove my point about you being a child. . .go on, do it. I know you must. Or simply do not reply and show the world you are not an immature child. What will kabar do. . .? Ah, heck, we know what kabar will do. . .LOL. . .go on. . .go on. . .internet tough guy. . .(waiting for juvenile in-coming rant).

[kabar]

You are creating a phony strawman. You don't have to violate any security regulations or divulge any secrets. I am not asking what program was involved or what the decision was. How dense are YOU?

I asked you if this alleged meeting took place at a country team meeting. No answer. I asked who made the final decision. No answer. The idea that FSOs vote on policy or exceeded their authority making policy recommendations is nonsense.

You can continue evading the answers and playing secret squrriel. You make these charges and can't back them up.