Not a clue, but to be honest this scares the cr@p out of me. I see no way that this can be a good sign.
1) It shows that they do not have a secure means of communication, or at least they do not believe they do.
2) It shows that they have something important enough to discuss, en toto, that would require a secure means of communication which is currently unavailable.
3) It is occurring during the fall of Egypt, and amidst the fall of multiple other countries, to Islamic rule.
4) It is gathering a multitude of KEY PERSONNEL in one area, which is a security nightmare. Someone with the drive and means could turn this into a deadly affair.
5) Obama is echoing the words of the Muslim Brotherhood and, according to some reports from BBC Arabic, is backing ElBaradei as the replacement for Mubarak.
I’m sure I could go on, but why bother? We know this is bad. How can it not be? Obama has screwed up everything else since he took office, why not add global war to his list of flubs?
Clinton may be reading them the riot act because for years(whether run by democrat or republican administrations) the department of State has always done their own little thing with departments acting like their own little caliphates regardless of what the SOS would like them to do. The Ambassadors themselves in many cases are pursuing contrary directions to that of the US instead of representing the best interests of the US! Hence for years the US has been hamstrung in foreign policy by these weasels in the foreign service and presidents, both Dem and Repubs have been partially blinded! That needs to stop!
ALSO.... Hillary is a drama queen.
Good points. Scary times.
Agreed. Thisis NOT good.
Muslim Brotherhood (al Qaida)/Mohammedans know The Obammunist is out in 2012, they have two years to move with his assistance.
yitbos