Replies

You have reached new heights of ridiculousness now. Do you REALLY expect the HDOH to state that the online digital image is invalid, forged, or inauthentic? Why would they say that? For one thing, they’re partisans. For another thing, the entire state depends upon largesse from the Federal Govt., which Obama controls. As if that’s not enough, they would bring down the wrath of ObamaKhan on their heads. Why would they do that when they support him? Get real. What’s important is that they WILL NOT vouch for it, in any way, shape, or form. Now some Democrats in the Hawaiian legislature are trying to do an end run around the issue, hoping that if they can send out “SOMETHING” that says merely that he was born in Hawaii, that somehow that will keep him from having to produce a long-form birth certificate to get on the 2012 ballot and especially so that they will not be asked by a court or any election supervisor TO AUTHENTICATE that online COLB. If Obama should present a COLB that looks like the online image, then the elections officials can ask Hawaii to VERIFY every important piece of information on it. They don’t want to be in the position of having to say something’s not true and for sure they don’t want to be put into the position of having to produce and certify a NEW COLB for him. Because you can bet your sweet bippy that it won’t MATCH the online COLB, thus proving him the fraud that too many of us already suspect that he is.

You can quote Janice Okubo until the cows come home, but she NEVER authenticated that online image NOR did she attest in any way that the so-called facts on it are true. The bottom line is this:

IF OBAMA WOULD GIVE HIS CONSENT, THE VITAL RECORDS ON FILE IN HAWAII CAN AND WOULD BE RELEASED.

WHY WON’T HE GIVE HIS CONSENT TO RELEASE HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE OR WHATEVER PASSES IN HAWAII FOR A BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

WHY, INSTEAD, DOES HE SPEND MILLIONS FIGHTING THE PRODUCTION OF THE PROOF AND WHY DID HE IMPRISON LTC LAKIN?

In my humble opinion, Obama considers it to be to his political advantage to tell the birthers (who would never vote for him in a million years) to go stuff it.
1) It forces Republicans to take a stand on the issue and some of the Congressional leaders in the House have come out in support of him.
The more Republicans who say that the birther issue is off the table, the less likely Obama is to ever release a long form birth certificate. Its a classic Saul Alinsky, “Rules for Radicals” divide and conquer technique.
2) He gets to play the victim which appeals to his liberal base.

There is no need to authenticate an online scanned image when the state of Hawaii, under the previous administration verified the original birth records.
With only the online scanned image, he was able to get 69.4 million votes and 363 Electoral votes.

Here’s the Saul Alinsky quote that explains Obama’s birth certificate strategy:
“The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”

“Birthers” are Obama’s enemies. By not releasing his long form birth certificate, he is goading his most strident political opposition and guiding a split in the right of center ranks. Obama hopes to use that division as a strength in 2012.

Its a classic Saul Alinsky, “Rules for Radicals” divide and conquer technique.
******

Perhaps so, but it’s a sad thing for you to have to admit that FACT about someone who’s supposed to represent ALL of the people. He’s supposed to be the president of all the people, not just those who aren’t his “enemies”. “Divide and conquer” from a person who campaigned as a great, post-racial uniter? Doesn’t that alone tell you a lot about the character of this person? Do you admire him for this?