Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RR: 46% of GOP Primary Voters Who Favor Palin Might Back Third-Party Option If She Isn’t Nominated
Rasmussen Reports ^ | January 30, 2011 | Rasmussen Reports

Posted on 01/30/2011 10:33:33 AM PST by parksstp

Nearly half of the Republican Primary voters who support Sarah Palin say they are at least somewhat likely to vote for a third-party candidate if she does not win the GOP presidential nomination.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; elections; elections2012; freepressforpalin; palin; presidentialelection; sarah; sarahpalin; smellthefear; thirdparty; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-360 next last
To: editor-surveyor
I have to admit that I have been thoroughly shocked at the positions of many here that I once would have trusted. This is getting to be a hazardous world.

What, because we don't happen to support your particular choice for the GOP nomination?

That is seriously immature.

321 posted on 01/30/2011 6:24:25 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

I’m not sure that you will be rewarded for throwing logical arguments into the fray, but your point deserves serious consideration. The conservative tide is ascendant and can prevail in 2012. But, the candidate must be a genuine conservative and must be palatable to the independent swing voters who will decide the winner in the next election. The field is wide open at this stage, but the candidate who can score on both points will be revealed as the play unfolds upon the stage.


322 posted on 01/30/2011 6:26:58 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

If you don’t believe in polling take it up with the pollsters, but keep the silly comments to yourself. Before someone thinks you have gone over the deep end, which is very possible, from your comment.


323 posted on 01/30/2011 6:27:35 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: parksstp
Sorry for the long post

Don't worry about it. If posting long posts was a crime, I'd have been take out behind the police station and shot long ago.

324 posted on 01/30/2011 6:29:03 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

>> “What, because we don’t happen to support your particular choice for the GOP nomination?” <<

.
No, because of the extent to which you would go to defeat a candidate. You are the things that you do.


325 posted on 01/30/2011 6:31:14 PM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat; editor-surveyor
If you don’t believe in polling take it up with the pollsters, but keep the silly comments to yourself. Before someone thinks you have gone over the deep end, which is very possible, from your comment.

You're missing the point though. Polls are not true or false based on their actual validity. Polls are true when they say the things we want them to say, and they are dirty, MSM-driven falsehoods when they say things we don't want them to say.

326 posted on 01/30/2011 6:31:48 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

You can hope that its ‘silly,’ but it’ll be just like it was in Alaska; count on it.


327 posted on 01/30/2011 6:32:48 PM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Pox

Every night you need to stand in front of the mirror and thrust your left hand and arm forward while saying in your most authoritative voice: Heil Obama. Practice often until it conveys the voice of sincerity and commitment. You will need this skill in the new America that you will help to bring us.


328 posted on 01/30/2011 6:33:00 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Polls are limited to preordained choices; they are not ‘essay’ questions.

Polls always say exactly what the pollster designed them to say.

Any portion of any poll that fails to achieve that end is always discarded.


329 posted on 01/30/2011 6:36:34 PM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
No, because of the extent to which you would go to defeat a candidate. You are the things that you do.

And exactly what is the "extent" to which you think I "would go" to "defeat a candidate"?

Especially odd since I'm not actually against Sarah Palin. I'd be fine with it if she were the GOP nominee. Nevertheless, she also has negative points, and it is unhealthy to just gloss over and pretend like these don't exist, just to maintain her personality cult. I think she ought to get the same shake as any of the rest of the potential nominees who will most assuredly be cropping up between not and June 2012. Part of that "getting the same shake," however, means that her record should be combed over as part of the vetting process, too, just like anyone else's will be.

If you think this is "doing anything to defeat a candidate," then you do NOT have the maturity level necessary to be involved in politics.

330 posted on 01/30/2011 6:37:22 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

too bad that you threw your credibility in the fire, huh?


331 posted on 01/30/2011 6:39:35 PM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Okay. So what is your proof of that? I mean, can you show us an example of poll results being discarded because they didn’t say what a pollster wanted them to say?


332 posted on 01/30/2011 6:39:50 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

too bad that you threw your credibility in the fire, huh?


333 posted on 01/30/2011 6:39:52 PM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

You are one sharp cookie Mr. Titus!!!!! Excellent, That is a complement!!!


334 posted on 01/30/2011 6:40:36 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

One who lies is called a liar.


335 posted on 01/30/2011 6:41:08 PM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
too bad that you threw your credibility in the fire, huh?

And when did I do that?

And why do you think you get to be an arbiter of "credibility"?

336 posted on 01/30/2011 6:41:45 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

How old are you again?


337 posted on 01/30/2011 6:43:43 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

When you throw a rock over the fence, the dog that yelps...


338 posted on 01/30/2011 6:56:43 PM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
LOL, you're displaying a lefty trait, “projection”, and it would not surprise me at all if you frequently practice that scenario on a regular basis.

Are you afraid of a conservative party displacing the GOP and actually representing those that elect them? I would think that the vast majority on this board would prefer that to our current alternatives, and if the Republican party cannot be saved from the RINO’s and establishment elites, they deserve to be replaced by a conservative party and then the GOP can be absorbed by the dem party as it rightfully should be.

Anyone that votes for the "lesser of two evils" is only perpetuating the slide towards marxism/communism/totalitarianism and should be preparing for the consequences of their voting habits.

Again, I hope I'm wrong, but looking at history, I'm afraid I'm not.

339 posted on 01/30/2011 7:26:00 PM PST by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: Pox

Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama. All dedicated leftists who were elevated to the Presidency of a conservative leaning country in large part because a number of conservatives refused to accept the reality of our two party system, especially as it applies to Presidential politics.


340 posted on 01/30/2011 7:47:45 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-360 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson