Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: rabscuttle385
Are they really THAT STUPID?
2 posted on
01/30/2011 8:06:31 AM PST by
BobL
(PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
To: rabscuttle385
It’s stupid.
Rail is fine for cattle but people want the most expedient method of travel to get to their destination.
4 posted on
01/30/2011 8:08:37 AM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: rabscuttle385
Note to Congress...What part of "No" don't you understand?
7 posted on
01/30/2011 8:10:11 AM PST by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: rabscuttle385
That didn’t take long at all.
10 posted on
01/30/2011 8:12:03 AM PST by
Rappini
To: rabscuttle385
Noooo! Not one cent of my money to build these union job-factories/treasure chests!
11 posted on
01/30/2011 8:12:53 AM PST by
REPANDPROUDOFIT
(General, sir, it is perfectly ok to call me "ma'am"!)
To: rabscuttle385
Atlas is shrugging. Railroads? Rand was prophetic. The lowest priority I have right now is a railroad or health insurance.
To: rabscuttle385
Mica has been fighting for a federally funded rail project in Central Florida his entire career. I don’t think a little thing like the Tea Party is going to stop him.
To: rabscuttle385
TRANSLATION: RINO’s eagerly seek taxpayer money to make them look good to their constituents!!
To: rabscuttle385
"...I believe all of America, in the various corridors around the country, will want high-speed rail if they see success here... Typical political thinking: Build it then see if the consumer wants it.
24 posted on
01/30/2011 8:20:47 AM PST by
econjack
(Some people are as dumb as soup.)
To: rabscuttle385
To: rabscuttle385
"I believe it's good for America to develop a high-speed rail corridor in the Northeast corridor,
While the poor saps in the rest of the nation pay for it.
35 posted on
01/30/2011 8:32:04 AM PST by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: rabscuttle385
Funny thing, I don't remember anything about building railroads or Amtrack in the Constitution.
36 posted on
01/30/2011 8:33:53 AM PST by
Tupelo
To: rabscuttle385
To: rabscuttle385
As a practical matter I wouldn’t get too upset about a rail project if we weren’t bankrupt.
But we are bankrupt, and nothing about high speed rail will help to change that. To pump billions into it, while we’re bankrupt, while shutting off energy development, which is the engine of the economy, is entirely backward.
Want to get the economy moving? Bulldoze regulations that make it excrutiatingly difficult to build any kind of power plant or factory. Do that, and leave the boondoggles alone.
40 posted on
01/30/2011 8:43:14 AM PST by
marron
To: rabscuttle385
There is no way a totally private rail system can be built and run at a profit. The fares would have to be enormous and that would kill off the ridership.
Forget it.
46 posted on
01/30/2011 8:48:06 AM PST by
Right Wing Assault
(Our Constitution: the new Inconvenient Truth)
To: rabscuttle385
Dear Dumbass RINO-RATS:
If railroads make sense, let the free market provide it. CUT THE DAMN BUDGET!
47 posted on
01/30/2011 8:50:52 AM PST by
SC_Pete
To: rabscuttle385
This topic brings that old saying- “ride them out on a rail” to mind...
48 posted on
01/30/2011 8:53:51 AM PST by
mikrofon
(Trained parrots)
To: rabscuttle385
51 posted on
01/30/2011 8:56:59 AM PST by
rrrod
(at home in Medellin Colombia)
To: rabscuttle385
peanuts
compared to how we send aid
to Afghanistan
Iraq
Egypt
and other enemies of the United States
56 posted on
01/30/2011 9:09:50 AM PST by
Talf
To: rabscuttle385
Take names. Primary every one of them.
57 posted on
01/30/2011 9:11:15 AM PST by
bigbob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson