Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FromLori
What's up with this?

Quite aside from the current topic--and regardless of any other topic under discussion--would it be possible for us to agree upon the above clause (and its variant, What's up with that?) as one of nature's verbal warning signs of a speaker or writer so firmly stuck in the stand-up comedy conventions of twenty years back that whatever follows could automatically be regarded as probable nonsense?

I know that's probably intellectually lazy, but every time I read or hear that, I can't help but remember Cliff Claven in Cheers in his stand-up comic period, punctuating every commonplace observation with "What's up with that?" and expecting laughter and looking more like a fool than ever.

Sorry for the rant, but stomach is currently in revolt against its contents, and it's got to come out one end or the other.

Regards,

Dunce.

P.S. Also unrelated to the current topic: Could we also hope for a moratorium on the use of the phrase "Back in the day" by anybody under the age of forty-five?

55 posted on 01/30/2011 8:25:26 AM PST by Dunstan McShane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dunstan McShane
would it be possible for us to agree upon ...

No

I know that's probably intellectually lazy...

Yes

stomach is currently in revolt against its contents...

Gross

Could we also hope for a moratorium...

No

Next!

82 posted on 01/30/2011 10:46:12 AM PST by lonevoice (Where the Welfare State is on the march, the Police State is not far behind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson