To: FromLori
Redford may be a hypocrite. This film proves nothing. He owns the land around Sundance . It was not wilderness when he bought it. It had no heritage anyone was interested in saving. He has every right to advocate a position he prefers and request to the regulatory entity to make any classification he finds in his own interest.
9 posted on
01/29/2011 4:08:49 PM PST by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
To: kbennkc
There is no such thing as a liberal who isn’t a hypocrite.
11 posted on
01/29/2011 4:13:25 PM PST by
bcr100
To: kbennkc
Yeah he’s got that right. But he doesn’t have the right to lecture the rest of us AND do his level best to make his point of view a point of law or regulation for the rest of us.
13 posted on
01/29/2011 4:15:47 PM PST by
jmacusa
(Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
To: kbennkc
He has every right to be a hypocrite and we have every right to call him on it.
15 posted on
01/29/2011 4:22:37 PM PST by
beandog
To: kbennkc
What part of that is different from the land in the Napa Valley he doesn’t want developed? Doesn’t anyone own it? Was it wilderness when they bought it? Does it have any heritage someone wants to save?
25 posted on
01/29/2011 6:30:05 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson