As I said, just before the Super Tuesday vote on February 5, 2008, Rush clearly stated a preference for Romney over McCain. Others stated it in more explicit terms.
RUSH: I think now, based on the way the campaign has shaken out, that there probably is a candidate on our side who does embody all three legs of the conservative stool, and thats Romney. The three stools or the three legs of the stool are national security/foreign policy, the social conservatives, and the fiscal conservatives. The social conservatives are the cultural people. The fiscal conservatives are the economic crowd: low taxes, smaller government, get out of the way.
Rush Limbaugh *endorses Mitt Romney
When anyone finds themselves so obsessed that they can't acknowledge obvious and fairly benign facts, maybe they need to engage in a little self-examination.
Argue with each other on this subject about which your are clearly wrong.
It's time to send that degenerate factoid down the Freeper memory hole. How long before the Red Guard comes for you?
"Behind the empty gestures and deceptive rhetoric, Romney was not pro-life
or a defender of marriage by any stretch of the imagination.
He was a disaster," said O'Gorman, of the board for Massachusetts Citizens for Life.
He said Romney "deceptively" claims to have been awarded
a pro-life award from the group.
"The award Romney arranged for himself with the local Pioneer Valley Chapter
was the Mullins Award for Political Leadership, not a pro-life award
and not approved by MCFL's state board of directors," he said.
"We're blowing the whistle to warn voters
"
[Family leaders call Romney 'disaster' - Letter criticizes 'deceptive rhetoric' around candidate]
Myth Romney, plagiarist, taking credit for Duncan Hunter's fence, without attribution.