Posted on 01/28/2011 11:13:18 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011, a man by the name of Barack Hussein Obama took his place at the rostrum before the two houses of Congress to deliver his State of the Union address. He was greeted by the members with smiles and great courtesy even though a growing number of Americans believe that he is not eligible to be President — an imposter.
Here is a man with the greatest power on Earth, who can order Air Force One to take him anywhere on the planet, who has spent the last two years transforming America — yet he will not reveal his birth certificate. What is he hiding? And why is the Congress of the United States willing to sit and listen to this man who may very well be the cleverest imposter who ever existed?
We know of men who have pretended to be medical doctors and surgeons, who have actually performed the duties of a physician before they were uncovered as frauds. Men such as that usually go to jail. Americans are a very trusting people, and we tend to believe what people tell us about themselves.
Yet, we have a Constitution that describes the qualifications of a President. Article II, Section I states: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
Well, how do we know for sure that a candidate for the office of President was born in the United States? By his birth certificate. But no one in Congress or on the Supreme Court has ever seen Barack Obama’s original long-form birth certificate. Should he not have made it public when he sought the nomination for the presidency? Why was it not demanded of him by the proper authorities? Would his birth certificate actually reveal that he is not eligible to be President?
Is not the office of President important enough to require irrefutable proof of eligibility on the part of any candidate for that position of enormous power? He holds the fate of 300 million people in his hands. What if it is later determined that Obama is indeed an imposter — what then?
All of us, at some point in our lives, have to show our birth certificates to proper authorities, whether it’s to obtain a passport, or to be hired to a sensitive position in government or private industry, or to prove our citizenship. So why is Obama exempted from providing proof of his citizenship by birth? He is no ordinary American applying for a passport. He is the Commander in Chief of our armed forces, he lives in our presidential mansion known as the White House, and he had the entire Congress of the United States listening to his every word last night, even though he refuses to provide them with his birth certificate.
As a master imposter, he is also a master hypnotist. Otherwise, how could he convince everyone in Congress that he is the genuine article? What he said in his State of the Union address is irrelevant compared to the fact that he stood before the lawmakers of America and refused to prove that he is a citizen of the United States by birth. There should be no doubt in the minds of Americans that their President was indeed born in the United States and is eligible to hold that office. And as long as Obama refuses to show us his birth certificate, those doubts will persist.
Meanwhile, Hawaii's Governor, Neil Abercrombie, announced that he would dig up Obama’s Hawaiian long-form birth certificate in order to finally put an end to speculation about his eligibility to be President. However, it turns out the greatly frustrated Governor was unable to find any documentation. Apparently, there are no papers that name either the Hawaiian hospital in which Obama was born or the physician who attended his birth. And if such a doctor existed, would he not by now have identified himself?
Most likely, the eligibility issue will come up in the election of 2012. Obama will be forced to produce documentation that he is indeed a natural born citizen of the United States. And if he cannot come up with such documentation, then what?
As for his address, it was lackluster and boring, full of the usual clichés for which he is famous. He spoke a lot about education, proposing to replace No Child Left Behind with a Race to the Top. Thus, he expects the government to play an even bigger role in education, when the proper role for the federal government in education is no role at all. Education is not mentioned in the Constitution.
As for the country’s enormous debt, he expressed no sense of urgency about reducing it, offering only some minor spending cuts. He said nothing about inflation, which most people are concerned about. But he intends to oppose any attempts to repeal his healthcare program, even though the last thing our debt-ridden country needs is another costly entitlement program. He offered to help Republicans improve the program, not repeal it.
He’s obviously not in favor of smaller government. In fact, he advocated more government “investments” in clean energy technology, electric cars, more roads and bridges, more high-speed rail lines. He is still on the road to socialism, but pledged to work with Republicans in promoting “reform.” He will defend his agenda, but work with Republicans, he said. To what end? To prevent them from dismantling his socialist program. He doesn’t want smaller government — he wants more efficient big government.
He sounded remarkably like a clever, intelligent imposter trying to act like a legitimate President. But the speech was hollow. He is an excellent actor — which is what an imposter has to be. But a man without a birth certificate ought not to be President.
Even friends of Sr.’s admit they knew nothing of the miraculous birth. Scroll down about 2/5th of linked page to the friends’ letters. Lois claims he was born in Hawaii but never said she or any of them witnessed it or even knew about it at the time. Bob recalls the group hanging around a tree outside the university library but never mentions Ann ever being there (recall Gov. Abie claims she was or maybe he was told she left a post it note saying she was there but didn’t have time to wait around). In fact, NONE of the supposedly close knit group of Sr.’s friends ever mentions Ann nor do any of them mention throwing the happy couple a shower or gifts they presented to the new king.
http://cambodiana.org/MainreasonsofmysupportofObama.aspx
Link doesn’t work.
Like my tagline where the Kenyan Parliament stating he was born in Kenya?
Yep. Like that.
Not to mention how many votes he’d lose for not taking 5 minutes away from his ice cream eating time to disclose his BC and save Lakin from Leavenworth.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Exactly! A person that would do that pull the wings off flies for fun.
Even if dead by now, wouldn’t doctors have some records at their home? Wouldn’t their kids be interested enough to dig through the files just in case good ol’ dad delivered him?
Despite any gag order, you’d think that by now some nurse or night janitor at the hospital/s would have sneaked a peek at the records and told their hairdresser, who told their cousin, who told their dog walker, who told their neighbor, who told their mailman if the big O was born there. There are far too many sources where births are recorded - doctor’s notes, nurse’s notes, various hospital paperwork, hospital billing office, the county clerk, the state health department, and what about Ann’s prenatal care doctor/clinic records and all the baby/wedding showers her and Madelyn’s numberous friends should have thrown? I also find it strange that the Honolulu newspapers never kept the original issues of the birth announcement and that no one has ever found in their attic or their own baby book the newspaper page with their birth announcement along with Hussein’s listed as well. That brings up something else, I wonder if the black baby was such an embarrassment to the 1960s white Dunhams that he didn’t have a baby book or what is the reason there are no bun-in-the-oven pictures of Ann or hospital newborn pictures (again, not one of their friends has come forward with an Ann was pg story or an I changed the King’s diapers except Susan Blake in Seattle)?
Even better, the exonerated Lakin's cell.
It worked for me. Let’s try again.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/01/stanley_ann_dunham_and_the_lef.html
Thanks. Don’t know why it didn’t work the first time. Interesting and brings up questions about Dohrn.
Will it be as 'real' as the Dan Rather/TANG memo ????
No one really knows. Particularly the fools who voted for him.
Thats why I think he is refusing to release it. WIth out that as a shield, he has NO ANSWER to the fact he was born to a British father. As long as its hidden, there is some doubt, and afterbirthers can continue to point at it and laugh. With out it, there is just the glaring fact that the man could never have been considered a Natural Born Citizen.
I believe this is why Obama wants people pointing at his birth certificate. Its a dangerous game, because if public pressure gets high enough, he will be forced to legitimately address it. Doing that will force him from office almost immediately. So he has to keep people laughing at his birth certificate all while not taking it seriously.
Mocking ‘birthers’ plays into Obama’s hands.
Remember that every time you se someone mocking the issue, they are helping Obama conceal the truth.
HOW can you be made look like a fool when this irrelevant paper (forgery?) and red herring was released, when still the REAL issue, NBC, still stares right into yours and others faces---the CONSTITUTION, hmmm!!!
Thanks for posting that clip. It was fascinating. I admit I couldn’t tell, just from looking at the pictures, which ones were of Barry and which were of the look-alike Indonesian.
And still WHO is this man???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.