BS... we’re talking about residency not where you live....
You’re wrong...plain and simple...
Immanuel is the best of this worse lot of candidates...
Anyone else would be a disaster for our city...
Actually, we're talking about BOTH residency and where you live. Otherwise being a "qualified elector" would be enough to be a candidate, instead of being both a "qualified elector" and "residing in" the district. There is an "and" in 3.1-10-5(a):
... a qualified elector of the municipality and has resided in the municipality at least one year...
You can sue me, but I don't really care about Rahm's suitability for the job. I care about the law, and about judges repealing law from the bench:
... a qualified elector of the municipalityand has resided in the municipality at least one year...