Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Illinois] Supreme Court: Emanuel on Chicago mayor ballot
Chicago Tribune ^ | 1/27/11 | Liam Ford

Posted on 01/27/2011 3:19:12 PM PST by Chicago Lampoon

Did anyone really doubt that the Chicago fix was in all along? The Illinois Supreme Court just announced a 5-2 decision to allow Rahm Emanuel on the ballot for the February 22 Chicago mayoral election. Earlier today, former IL Republican Gov. Jim Thompson and other members of the state GOP establishment came out in favor of giving the former Obama ballot access.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsblogs.chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: chicagomayoralrace; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; emanuel; illinois; iscjumpedtheshark; iscjumpstheshark; lawisnotimportant; obama; obamascandals; rahmemanuel; selectednotelected; thechicagoway
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-228 next last
To: stylin19a
That was, in fact, the very first point I made on the first Freeper thread regarding Rahm's possible problem with residency.

I simply noted he'd not become a resident anywhere else, still voted in Chicago, had property in Chicago, paid Illinois taxes, and was otherwise considered by everyone in America as just another crooked and corrupt Chicago politician.

I think that covers intent.

The court, in my judgment made the correct decision since every American citizen is, one way or the other, a legal resident somewhere, and actually does "reside in" someplace, and once he's established residency for whatever purpose (a license perhaps, to vote, to run for office, etc.) he must affirmatively reject that residency and get another to lose the one he has ~ and he didn't.

I think some folks were interpreting "intent" as little more than a "state of mind" which can't really be determined since people will lie about it.

The court correctly noted that Rahm didn't do anything that said he wasn't going to come back home as soon as possible.

If you apply this to ILLEGAL ALIENS you'd have the court ruling that since they didn't even bother to get here with a visa that allows permanent residency, they have not yet done anything to REJECT their former residency somewhere in Mexico (for 90% of them).

Same with their babies. As far as we can tell someone with Mexican residency birthed them, so presumably the babies share residency with their parents ~ and that's in Mexico.

American born babies are treated the same ~ they share the residency of their parents.

101 posted on 01/27/2011 8:09:06 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Chicago Lampoon

Shocker! (/sarcasm)


102 posted on 01/27/2011 8:37:25 PM PST by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

After reading your post I realized he had to have income from Illinois...rental income from renting out his house. Along with his deduction for property taxes (and mortgage interest, if any).


103 posted on 01/27/2011 8:42:01 PM PST by coaltrain (Obama's a Harvard lawyer like Elvis was a Black Belt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: coaltrain

Who knows, Illinois is so corrupt that laws don’t really matter anyway.

Rahm gets to be the next Chicago mayor.


104 posted on 01/27/2011 8:50:37 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

I would be interested if you do hear an answer, maybe you can call in to WLS or Rush ;). I was listening to WLS online when that issue was brought up, but I had to go and didn’t get a chance to hear any of the discussion.

I’m guessing the residency requirement for city employees only applies once someone actually has the job. I don’t think this ruling would change that, especially since this case applied to election laws only.


105 posted on 01/27/2011 8:53:44 PM PST by coaltrain (Obama's a Harvard lawyer like Elvis was a Black Belt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

It will be interesting to see if Rahm’s poll numbers go up or down after this residency battle. It may actually get him some sort of sympathy vote. Can you believe it, sympathy for Rahm? If he does improve in the polls, the next story will be that he was behind the scenes pushing for this issue to go to the courts.


106 posted on 01/27/2011 8:57:04 PM PST by coaltrain (Obama's a Harvard lawyer like Elvis was a Black Belt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: coaltrain

I was under the impression that if he gets on the ballot he will win. Think of the alternative, Carol Moseley Braun.
If you lived in Chicago, who would you chose to run the machine?


107 posted on 01/27/2011 9:07:05 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Chicago Lampoon

Wow, what a corrupt state. No real rule of law in operation. And yet, they can’t figure out why Chicago hasn’t become a mecca for the high tech industry.

On the other hand, it’s pretty easy to see how Obama came to believe it isn’t necessary for him to follow the law either.


108 posted on 01/27/2011 9:33:03 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the right stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

They have already started counting the “votes” most likely. Just because they are dead doesn’t mean they can’t vote a few times.


109 posted on 01/27/2011 9:39:30 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Chicago Lampoon

Chicago - where everthing and everyone is for sale.


110 posted on 01/27/2011 9:54:03 PM PST by sjmjax (Politicans are like bananas - they start out green, turn yellow, then rot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chicago Lampoon

Oh my. Rahmbo’s a sawed-off Witch-King, the First, albeit the most diminutive, of the Nine. And Chicago will be his Angmar.


111 posted on 01/27/2011 10:53:27 PM PST by eater-of-toast ("It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." -- Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus

Hey, it could have been worse than that!

They might wake up with Emanuel in their bed!


112 posted on 01/27/2011 11:02:57 PM PST by Ronin ("Dismantle the TSA and send the screeners back to Wal-Mart.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Shady
What laws? We don’t need no stinkin’ laws? .................................................. An old Greek said that laws are like fine spider webs that catch the small and do them to death but the large and powerful pass through them as if they were not there.
113 posted on 01/27/2011 11:40:01 PM PST by fella (.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ETL; Chicago Lampoon

114 posted on 01/28/2011 12:45:42 AM PST by Seadog Bytes (OPM: The Liberal solution to every societal problem... Other People's Money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Let's Roll

“Don’t know how the black voters felt about Carol Moseley Brown”

If the voters of Chicago think Rahm can bring home more freebies than Carol Mosely, they will vote Rahm.

The unions will tell the folks who to vote for.

Right now, most think Rahm will bring home more pork. Carol Mosely is a has been, and has now power to bring home goodies and freebies (payoffs) from the feds.


115 posted on 01/28/2011 2:55:34 AM PST by esoxmagnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WatchYourself

“I hope all of these leftwing cities and states “

If you look at an Illinois map, only Cook county is blue. The rest of the entire state is red.

We all suffer here in the state because of the voting power of the city. The vote of illegals, and the busing of other interest groups to polling places, added with just plain corruption in the city and Cook county nullify the rest of the entire state.


116 posted on 01/28/2011 3:07:50 AM PST by esoxmagnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Chicago Lampoon

Now the people of Chicago can relax: Help is on the way! And they sincerely, sincerely, (as Jack F. Kemp used to say) believe that!


117 posted on 01/28/2011 3:45:07 AM PST by Theodore R. (Rush was right when he said America may survive Obama but not the Obama supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Did you read the appeals court decision?

The law makes a distinction between residency for voting and residency for candidates. Rahm is clearly still a qualified voter in Chicago, but that is only one part of the requirement for candidacy. If only his voting residence mattered, that’s all the candidate law would have specified, but it doesn’t, it requires that the candidate “reside in” the district.

It specifically waives military personnel from the 1-year “resides in” requirement, but it doesn’t waive people “in the service of the United States,” that only applies to voters.


118 posted on 01/28/2011 3:55:57 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Chicago Lampoon

I’m a resident of Illinois, but for the past two years I have been working and living in an apt in Georgia. I go home periodically.

I have as yet not changed my residency, (I might now if Ill income taxes might effect my income, but that would be for next year.)

Here is my point, I am still a registered voter in Illinois.

If Emmanuel did the same thing, work in DC but never relinquished his residency, then WHAT ARE YOU PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT....?

NO FIX...JUST THE RIGHT DECISION....


119 posted on 01/28/2011 4:03:33 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Did you read the appeals court decision?

Being a voter in Chicago is not the same thing as “residing in” Chicago, and both things are required to be a candidate for Mayor, unless you’re in the US military.

You don’t “reside in” Chicago, you “reside in” an apartment in Georgia.


120 posted on 01/28/2011 4:13:36 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-228 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson