Skip to comments.
Arrested victim of mass shooting speaks out, explains threat (Fuller)
KGUN9-TV ^
| January 26, 2011
| Craig Smith
Posted on 01/27/2011 9:18:11 AM PST by Charles Martel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Qbert
That was bullshit and he knows it. The only ones that believe his “explaination” are the media.
21
posted on
01/27/2011 10:00:03 AM PST
by
sport
To: Charles Martel
I wonder if this guy understands that normal people, (and that includes tea partiers) never even consider threatening to kill someone. Such activity is the purview of crazy and/or barbaric people.
22
posted on
01/27/2011 10:00:12 AM PST
by
Pete
(29thday.org Exponential problems require exponential solutions)
To: Navy Patriot
To: Presbyterian Reporter
24
posted on
01/27/2011 10:06:49 AM PST
by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: Polynikes
Yes, I know about Greg Howard’s compilation of interesting information about Mr. Fuller. I was a bit surprised that the guy surfaced again, given the nature of the things he apparently tried to conceal.
25
posted on
01/27/2011 10:06:49 AM PST
by
Charles Martel
(Endeavor to persevere...)
To: Presbyterian Reporter
J Eric Fuller being formerly Prince Eric Fuller.
Soooooo, this guy is the nut-job formally known as Prince?
26
posted on
01/27/2011 10:08:45 AM PST
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: Charles Martel
Thankfully, this nutbag is now a "prohibited person". Loughner might have been as well had Sheriff Dipstick been doing his job.
27
posted on
01/27/2011 10:11:18 AM PST
by
Redcloak
(What's your zombie plan?)
To: Charles Martel
Like we believe Eric Fuller. ha
28
posted on
01/27/2011 10:16:53 AM PST
by
machogirl
(First they came for my tagline)
To: CottShop
it took his lawyers two weeks to come up with this lame excuse for what nutcase client said? He might wanna think about firing his lawyers imediately if this is the case I'm of the suspicion that his legal counsel is provided by VPC, Brady Campaign or some other nest of anti-gun snakes. The lameness of the explanation doesn't matter - Fuller is clearly going to be used as a disposable tool.
29
posted on
01/27/2011 10:19:36 AM PST
by
Charles Martel
(Endeavor to persevere...)
To: Charles Martel
Once a cowardly fool always a cowardly fool. He foolishly left his own protection up to the govt and when it failed, rather than face his own responsibility, he tried to blame others. Typical irresponsibile “citizen”.
30
posted on
01/27/2011 10:42:24 AM PST
by
Seruzawa
(If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
To: Carley
Oh, am I allowed to say hanging?Yes. He's white.
31
posted on
01/27/2011 12:15:43 PM PST
by
JimRed
(Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty too! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: Charles Martel
This guy must think he’s in a labor union, thinking that threatening people with violence is allowed.
32
posted on
01/27/2011 12:18:07 PM PST
by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
To: Redcloak
From post 23, it appears that he has been a “prohibited person” for some time.
To: Polynikes
His FB page has been removed. I was kinda disappointed. I’ll be it was a real “hoot”.
34
posted on
01/27/2011 7:28:26 PM PST
by
abigailsmybaby
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we'll bring a gun". BHO)
To: Polynikes
His FB page has been removed. I was kinda disappointed. I’ll bet it was a real “hoot”.
35
posted on
01/27/2011 7:28:48 PM PST
by
abigailsmybaby
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we'll bring a gun". BHO)
To: Polynikes
36
posted on
01/27/2011 9:04:38 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
( BORN free - taxed to DEATH (and beyond) ...)
To: Charles Martel
Deputies took Fuller's actions as a serious threat. They did more than arrest Fuller. They invoked a state law called Title 36 and placed him under an involuntary psychiatric evaluation. Interesting. Pima County Sheriff Dupnik wasted no time in getting this nuthouse Fuller involuntarily committed for evaluation. Why isn't KGUN9 or any other Tucson news outlet investigating why Dupnik never did the same for Loughner?
37
posted on
01/28/2011 7:34:41 AM PST
by
VeniVidiVici
(WTF with Obama!!)
To: kingu
The constitution IS for the government.
It was not intended to prescribe the behaviour of citizens at all.
That is why I don’t favour several proposed amendments - like the flag burning one (though I might favour protection from prosecution of people who protect said flag).
Just a thought. I understand your sentiment perfectly well.
38
posted on
01/28/2011 3:07:27 PM PST
by
Apogee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson