But that’s not nullification. It’s civil disobedience. Nullification, as a legal doctrine, is nonsense.
And that’s a semantic game. It’s a stimulus that anticipates a specific response. That process is what is important and not what it’s called. IMHO, of course.
Puck, I’m haven’t a clue what it is you’re trying to accomplish with your incessant negative bile. If you think for a minute we will reclaim all our rights in one fell swoop, you’re an idiot. Would you care to enlighten the class with your suggestions?
“What a dumb waste of time. Nullification? What’s next? Secession?”
If necessary yes. You claim to be an anti-federalist well we trying to do something about it.
“But that’s not nullification. It’s civil disobedience. Nullification, as a legal doctrine, is nonsense.”
That is certainty what the Federal employees in black-robes will say. We aim to make them learn to respect the limits of their authority whether they mean to or not.
If we disarm the Federal Government of their few domestic enforcement agents and take on the responsibility of enforcing their few essential and legitimate domestic functions. We can render them fully impudent(As sphere to mostly like they are now) at least insofar as the domestic sphere goes.