[BuckeyeTexan]

Actually, in your analogy, the “Chief” is already in the house and the birthers are standing around arguing that he should never have been let inside instead of focusing on preventing him from taking anything.

[fr_freak]

Actually, in your analogy, the “Chief” is already in the house and the birthers are standing around arguing that he should never have been let inside instead of focusing on preventing him from taking anything.

Yes, that is correct. But, as I explained in post #27, while this guy is treated as a legitimate chief, he has the full power of the government behind him, and all the bureaucracy. Good luck fighting that. However, the "birthers" are asking whether this guy should have that power behind him. If he does not, then rather than go through years of legal wrangling which may not go your way, you can just boot the guy and invalidate everything he's done, which he's most likely done in direct opposition to the interest of the society he's supposed to be serving. At the very least, you can prevent him from doing further damage from this point on.