Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazlo in PA

Oh! Well that just clears everything up. A guy with a unknown blog has connected all the dots. That is an unimpeachable source wouldn’t you know.


As unimpeachable as a guy using multiple SSN’s including one that was issued in the state of CT to a person born in 1890 (which is indisputable as it is recorded on the Selective Service registration that Obama signed) and may be still using as President, wouldn’t you say?

I guess you did not read the research from 2nd link which pinpoints exactly how Obama managed to usurp the office of the presidency. FOIA requests are being issued for additional records and we will see where it leads. You’re asking for proof. On Obama’s first day in office he signed an EO sealing all of his records, so this evidence can only result from painstaking investigation.

Here is a lawsuit against Obamacare where they included as one of the counts Obama’s lack of constitutional qualifications.

Government files motion to dismiss in lawsuit that alleges healthcare bill is unconstitutional on 15 separate counts including Obama’s ineligibility.

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/government-files-motion-to-dismiss-in.html


102 posted on 01/26/2011 1:14:27 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Hotlanta Mike

This suit is a mess. The plaintiffs shoehorned the claim on Obamas fathers citizenship as an afterthought. The main claim is on Obamacare. If the material in the complaint is solid, why not sue as a separate issue. There is also an issue of standing. Just because you file a suit does not make it true. It will have to be taken up and then argued. This thing has just been filed and is based off information we already know and has been thrown out of court. I see the Tea Partiers doing this to lard up the suit to keep the Defendants bogged down. Smart move tactically.

So far you have given me do zero to advance your case other than links to blogs. I am aware of all the stuff the Birthers have on Obummer and it is not enough to convince most people or argue in court.


115 posted on 01/26/2011 1:37:46 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Hotlanta Mike
On Obama’s first day in office he signed an EO sealing all of his records, ...

Stop spreading that horsesh*t on FR. It's not true.

Barack Obama's first Executive Order, 13489, was regarding the release of Presidential Records stored in the National Archives and maintained by the National Archivist. The National Archives do not maintain, administer, or have any authority over the State of Hawaii's vital records or any university's transcripts to which the birthers want access. Obama's EO 13489 revoked Bush's EO 13233 on Presidential Records, which revoked Reagan's EO 12667 on Presidential Records. So essentially, Obama's EO restored the policy to Reagan's policy.

120 posted on 01/26/2011 2:05:08 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson