Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver

Let me preface the following with the qualification that I don’t like federal mandates for these things. However, I adopted these things (CFL’s) back when they were $5 a pop, without the subsidy. The reason? The payback threshold for these bulbs is pretty low. A 100W traditional bulb-equivalent CFL uses 26W of energy. That’s 74W of savings. If they last 1 year, a mere 2 hours a day of usage results in the full recovery of the bulb’s cost, assuming power costs $0.10 per kWH (74 x 2 x 365 / 1000W x .10) = $5.475.


41 posted on 01/25/2011 2:03:51 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei
assuming power costs $0.10 per kWH

If you were in California, the higher tier rates for most are more than $0.30 per kwhhr.

47 posted on 01/25/2011 2:07:11 PM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson