Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobinMasters
It was the comment by Obama himself at a 2009 international meeting that he was born eight months earlier than when his official story has claimed all along.

Freudian slip, confusion or the truth leaking out?

It was in April 19, 2009, at a press conference Obama gave at the Port of Spain in Trinidad and Tobago, Obama commented on a 90-minute diatribe that had been delivered by Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega at the meeting the day before, and Obama suggested he was born in January 1961, three months before the Bay of Pigs invasion.

Specifically, Obama rejected Ortega's attack on the United States for the attempted Bay of Pigs invasion during the Kennedy administration by explaining: "I'm grateful President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old."

What's more likely? That there was some conspiracy to pass Obama off as 8 months younger than he actually was or that he doesn't know when the Cuban Missile Crisis happened?

33 posted on 01/24/2011 5:23:22 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RobinMasters
My mistake, sorry.

What's more likely? That there was some conspiracy to pass Obama off as 8 months younger than he actually was or that he doesn't know when the Cuban Missile Crisis Bay of Pigs invasion happened?

It was a long time ago ...

I doubt he was really paying attention to things back then either ...

35 posted on 01/24/2011 5:29:45 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson