Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John W

The decision:

http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2011/1stDistrict/January/1110033.pdf


14 posted on 01/24/2011 10:29:53 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
The basic upshot is that the appeals court deemed the Board and the Circuit Court to have confused the legal principles of "domicile" and "residence:"

...it is elemental that domicile and residence are not synonymous." Pope v. Board of Election Commissioners, 370 Ill. 196, 202, 18 N.E.2d 214 (1938). As the supreme court further explained in Pope, the legal concept of "residence" requires a permanent abode.

15 posted on 01/24/2011 10:34:44 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson