Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CA Conservative
Interesting. So you have no radio or TV news there? Because I know out here the TV news often records audio of events, like protests, etc, and I seriously doubt they get a signed release from everyone in the crowd...

Signed release is not required when there is a microphone stuck in your face and you're talking into it, consent is implied.

Public events are just that - public. The law speaks to private conversations where a reasonable amount of privacy is to be expected.

72 posted on 01/24/2011 10:25:27 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Don't tell Obama what comes after a trillion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Graybeard58
Signed release is not required when there is a microphone stuck in your face and you're talking into it, consent is implied.

Public events are just that - public. The law speaks to private conversations where a reasonable amount of privacy is to be expected.

I was not talking abut the people getting interviewed - I was talking about people just a part of crowd protesting - they are getting recorded as well. And if being in public implies that there is an implied consent to being recorded, then that applies to officers as well...

The article is discussing conversations taking place as a part of the officer performing his public duty - often in public. If it is happening in public, such as getting cited or arrested at the side of the road, then there should be no expectation of privacy by the officer.

103 posted on 01/24/2011 4:07:00 PM PST by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson