Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Reader_David

How about putting a rider into the next law-enforcement block-grant legislation coming out of Congress making any state with a law forbidding the recording of public officials engaged in their public duties (executive sessions of deliberative bodies and judges in chambers excluded) ineligible for any money?

No exclusions. What do the judges have to hide?


27 posted on 01/24/2011 7:37:23 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: freedomfiter2

The reason for that exclusion in my proposal is that often discussions in camera involve sensitive information about litigant or defendants. I’m not proposing that exception to protect judges, but those they deal with.


33 posted on 01/24/2011 7:51:52 AM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson