[FrankR]

None of the DC Elite think it should be an issue, because it would point out how derelict they have been in their duties and oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.

Also, a big blowup about this right now would totally derail the agenda of the right, AND the left.

I cannot believe there is no provision or procedeure in place to cover the peaceful and systematic removal of an illegal president.

Nixon was forced out for knowledge of a campiagn break in; clinton was impeached for lying under oath about an affair, and yet we can't find a way to get legally get rid of a possible foreign tyrant doing his dead-level best to take us all out?

I'm glad the volume is being turned up on this BC thing, maybe we'll soon find out one way or the other...then, maybe not.

[Smokeyblue]

“removal of an illegal president”

Removal of an illegal usurper.

He’s not President. He has not qualified.