Posted on 01/22/2011 8:52:50 PM PST by pissant
I am beginning to get that drift. The moderators allow Palin’s show (WHICH I WATCH AND LIKE as well as I like Palin) as BREAKING NEWS, is a bit much.
I see that. If this article were Palin instead of Bachmann it would be breaking news along with Palin’s show thread. That is truly ashame being that she is not even running as far as we know. Foolish people will elect Obama again.
Independent voters like her. She is sharp. Was her name included in the last straw poll in NH where the media’s loser RomneyObamaCare supposedly won?
Excuse me, Sarah Palin campaigned for MIchele Bachmann.
All things being equal, what would be the difference? Was Lady Thatcher not the right choice for the Brits?
Indylindy never disappoints
The term is Alinskyized. And Bachmann won’t be Alinskyized.
Good Lord this is not 5th grade this is political primary’s.
Palin and Bachmann will campaign for each other. They both put country first and realize the seriousness and urgency of stopping a man that is taking over like Hitler wanted to.
Put the kool aid down, please; primary infighting is normal but your sig quote is a bit frightening when Palin has not even put her hat in the ring. It is your right of course to say Palin or bust but I am just kindly trying to point out that, that could mean Obama 2012.
Bachmann has a better reaction from Independent voters.
I just don’t want Obama to win. Just sayin :)
ping
Oh sure, all the men who have been elected have done wonders for this country, haven’t they? They are the ones who have put this country in the mess its in - not the women.
Your post sounds very sexist.
Bachmann has a better reaction from Independent voters.
I challenge that statement.
Yes, men have screwed up this country royally. But think seriously for a second about the scenario of an all-woman legislature, executive and judiciary, and I think the nightmare would become apparent. Women are reliably more liberal in all polls taken, vote Democrat much more readily than men, are considerably less conservative, and govern with their feeling, if not initially, then eventually.
Are there exceptions? Sure their are. Thatcher is one.
Jerk and a coward. They go hand in hand. You have to disregard the rules because you lose arguments and look foolish. Thats why you do it.
I would still take Michele Bachmann over Sarah Palin. Michele is substance and firm stands without the glitz.
You are also wrong in your judgment. I have said many nice things about Palin on many different threads.
Opinions are like a**holes and you are one of them.
BTW I like Bachmann
I am not worried, nor do I feel ashamed for my posts. I don’t think Palin is the best candidate and I have stated that more than once. I also stick up for her when she is being treated unfairly. I have stated that if she is the nominee, she will get my vote. What more do you want?
I think she is a good person, her intent is good. I just don’t think she has developed yet.
As for Bachmann. I like her for the reasons stated. She isn’t perfect, none of them are.
You see, many, not all of the people who like or support Palin, expect total fealty to Palin. No flaws must be discussed on a Palin thread.
But it sure doen’t seem to stop those same people from jumping on the bash train when discussing other potentials.
By far, our male pols have been outcrying our female ones! I’ll take each individual as I find him or her.
That's true. Maybe they aren't really men.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.