Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who reads FR? How many accounts on FR? What does FR stand for? Where is FR going?
01/19/11 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 01/19/2011 10:00:05 AM PST by Jim Robinson

Edited on 01/19/2011 10:21:38 AM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 781-788 next last
To: Jim Robinson

561 posted on 01/20/2011 6:28:28 PM PST by smokingfrog (BORN free - taxed to DEATH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Thank you for keeping hope alive, Jim!


562 posted on 01/20/2011 6:45:13 PM PST by mikeIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Even a cave man can donate.....................................Have you donated yet?

563 posted on 01/20/2011 6:52:46 PM PST by RedMDer (restoration of our honor, dignity, and freedoms will save America. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Rurudyne; steelyourfaith; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; AdmSmith; ...

564 posted on 01/20/2011 8:07:55 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

I figured I’d try that place out, give it a shot, and that’s basically all that site is... a bunch of phoney conservatives, concern trolls, liberals, malcontents, and an unhealthy obsession with FR. Plus they parrot the MSM line on Palin, they think they’re thinking for themselves but they’re really not.


565 posted on 01/20/2011 9:30:06 PM PST by Weird Tolkienish Figure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Well, probably the primary reason is we've narrowed our point of view lately as we've moved away from just talking about the issues and have actually started becoming constitutional activists.

Thank you Jim!

I couldn't agree more, that's what we are or should be!!

Yet, a handful freepers here have stooped to low-level by constantly painting many here with the derogatory label, "BIRTHERS." Actually the very first acting as such are Barry Soetoro, the Clintons in April 2008, and now recently by the hippie Gov. Abercommie!!!

566 posted on 01/21/2011 12:00:58 AM PST by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

“And, hopefully, someday we can say that we helped restore our beloved republic and our Liberty!”


Amen to that Jim Robinson! We love you and will continue to support Free Republic. You are right in that we are now activists and not just observers/commentors. We heard the call to action and responded! Remember November!


567 posted on 01/21/2011 12:30:46 AM PST by MWestMom (Tread carefully, truth lies here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Excellent post, sir.


568 posted on 01/21/2011 4:49:06 AM PST by Vor Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Thanks Jim. Though I’ve occasionally been temporarily banned sometimes mistakenly, sometimes I deserved it the value of FR and your hard work has never been lost on me. I agree with you entirely. We can not support the small tyrannies that some among us believe will make us more acceptable to the progressive political/media class. The best advice they have provided has been proven wrong time and time again. They tell us if only we embraced homosexual activism which provides a huge threat to liberty with the enacting of homosexual-centric laws to silence anyone that believes or dares speak even mildly the truth concerning the nature of the disgusting ‘lifestyle’ that suddenly our political tides would rise and all would be good in the world. They told us the same thing about abortion as if feasting politically on the blood of innocents is a popular cause. They believe these things because they are cowards many of whom seek favor with those in liberal metropolitan centers who they would have us believe is their goal to defeat and no matter how many times these issues have lost at the ballot box they still offer such dumb ideas as some kind of salvation under the guise of big tent which in reality is a very narrow tent because a majority in this country do not support these issues. Most in America don’t believe in killing the unborn as if they are nothing more than a tumor or disease, most don’t see the unnatural illogical egotist sexual behaviors of liberal sexual activists as desirable nor their efforts to create thought crimes to serve their political aims and intimidate their political opponents, most do not see the govt as too little, nor do they believe guns shoot themselves and should be banned. Most in America don’t believe mankind is a mistake nor that we should turn over to politically motivated liberal scientists trillions of dollars to solve a climate problem that doesn’t not exist.

What these big tent people want to do is suppress the big tent from rising, they want to keep out those who don’t fit their urban culture of shallow ‘doo-goodery’. They believe they are so intelligent as to be above question not even by God who they don’t even believe exists even though most of American does believe even if they don’t attend a church.
They know that unless they intimidate us into silence that their goals will be achieved through attrition without firing a shot and our America, the America of our founders and of our forebears will be gone.

As for those who want to focus on FreeRepublic for wielding a heavy hand I’d like to see them go over to Redstate or MotherRussiaState as I sometimes like to call it. I was banned for my first unfavorable reply to a post concerning Mark Kirk. See these open minded Rhinos are like liberals, they don’t like us caring about social issues or being rigid or single issue even though they most certainly do care and are. One doesn’t not protest or legislate what they do not care about.


569 posted on 01/21/2011 9:20:55 AM PST by Maelstorm (Better to keep your enemy in your sights than in your camp expecting him to guard your back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

I know, I know. I’ve been silly busy the last year and my entire routine was turned on it’s head.

Getting back into form!


570 posted on 01/21/2011 1:01:18 PM PST by Fledermaus (WAKE UP! Get rid of the LIBS in both parties. If not us, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Indeed, sir.


571 posted on 01/21/2011 1:22:52 PM PST by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Dittos


572 posted on 01/21/2011 3:38:10 PM PST by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!


573 posted on 01/21/2011 3:49:30 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weird Tolkienish Figure; Darksheare
"I figured I’d try that place out, give it a shot, and that’s basically all that site is... a bunch of phoney conservatives, concern trolls, liberals, malcontents, and an unhealthy obsession with FR."

I was under the impression that you were as happy as a pig in mud over there, WTF.

574 posted on 01/21/2011 11:12:57 PM PST by Semper Mark (Vlad Tepes was a piker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

10-4


575 posted on 01/21/2011 11:42:51 PM PST by KingNo155
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BelegStrongbow

Define your terms.


576 posted on 01/22/2011 3:12:21 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Markos33

It’s an ok site, it’s not a conservative site, it’s basically a political debate site.

I like FR because it’s a conservative site. Healthy left/right debate is fine, but I can get that in just about any site on the net. There’s a time to debate the issues, and then there comes a time to debate how we can change the nation.


577 posted on 01/22/2011 4:54:51 AM PST by Weird Tolkienish Figure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: Weird Tolkienish Figure
"It’s an ok site..."

Just ok, or wonderful?

578 posted on 01/22/2011 5:56:24 AM PST by Semper Mark (Vlad Tepes was a piker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

Re: “I have no problem with people posting left wing articles and left wing comments. I have no problem debating with people who direct their lives by the twin principles of premeditated ignorance and practiced irrationality. I have no problem searching out the original truths proving the sound bites liberals use for their points are no more than mantras chanted for a godless orthodoxy. As far as I am concerned, bring it on. I and others will bury them.”

That is the benefit I get from FreeRepublic. The vigorous, but civilized debates help to clarify issues.

I work in a very liberal environment. From reading on FR, I sometimes have read the debate about the latest demo talking points and have been able to contribute opposing viewpoints to my colleagues’ discussions without animosity. Often it makes them THINK!

At work I avoid directly criticizing 0bammy because many see any criticism of him as an attack upon their race. However, one colleague and I had a long discussion the other day about the deleterious effect of ‘taxing the rich” upon the economy. He did not know that NY and NJ have had measurable deceases in the total numbers of “rich” taxpayers and that no, or low tax states have had increases in population. He seemed to agree that higher taxes may not the solution to the budget crisis. We talked about the increases in the costs of Medicaid and Medicare and how those costs were not anticipated at the time they were implemented.

We have had several conversations like that. He knows I am the “Conservative” in the office, but that we can talk about issues without rancor. I think he at least listens to our points of view and that plants a seed.

Because I have sometimes read Freeper dissections by you or others, of the Libtard positions on this forum, I can sometimes present a reasoned response to some of their talking points, even in areas with which I am not particularly well versed.

I fear that if FR becomes a site where thoughtful debate is stifled, because an issue is presented by a non-believer and he or she gets zotted, there will be no forum available to see all sides of an issue being discussed.

I have looked upon FR as being the “free market of ideas” I have enjoyed the discussions of issues in a civilized manner. (Thank you, Moderators!) Ad hominem attacks, the first technique of the Libtards, are usually not successful in mis-directing the debate. Some Freeper will weigh in with a reasoned comment that will encourage the thread back to the issue.

Does this new policy mean that Freepers who may agree with a non-orthodox position will be zapped? If so, I fear that our FRiends with whom I disagree may disappear and I will not have the benefit of seeing other Freepers disassemble their positions in a reasoned, mutually respectful manner.

Mr. Reagan’s comment “Now there you go again” comes to mind.” He disagreed with his opponents but never displayed a lack of respect for them. So too many Freepers. I hope we do not lose that civil disagreement and devolve into something resembling DU or KOS

As an organization, we cannot be both for and against homosexuality, abortion, big government, border and national security, etc. I don’t know about others, but if we must choose, I choose to be on the right side of each and every issue. Why should FR use it’s limited resources to allow liberals, homosexualists, abortionists, big spenders, big taxers, big government solutions advocates, gun grabbers, pacifists, isolationists, environmentalists, open-borders lobbyists, etc, ply their trade on FR?


579 posted on 01/22/2011 6:07:40 AM PST by John Galt's cousin (Principled Conservatism NOW! * * * * * * * * * * Repeal the 17th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope

Excellent post.

Thank you


580 posted on 01/22/2011 6:12:47 AM PST by John Galt's cousin (Principled Conservatism NOW! * * * * * * * * * * Repeal the 17th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 781-788 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson