Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum
The debate over euthenasia is valid, but this guy was a psycho.

He basically was a serial killer who thought he found a niche that would let him indulge his urges without punishment.

3 posted on 01/17/2011 11:40:19 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dead

In a civilized country that values HUMAN LIFE a debate about euthanisia is unacceptable.

It is a CLOSED matter reserved for loved ones who are directly involved. There is a time when there is no point in allowing a humanbeing to suffer and to let them slip away. However there is NO NEED for the PUBLIC to decide WHEN this is appropriate or the need for a one size fits all LAW to take away your PERSONAL RIGHT as to WHEN this is.


5 posted on 01/17/2011 11:45:53 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: dead
I will give you a personal example.

Years ago my grandmother had congestive heart failure. They drained her lungs of fluid and brought her back. When she was fine and in sound mind, she stated to NEVER do that again. She fully recovered and about two days later it happened again. We respected her wishes and let her slip away.

Her PERSONAL request is NOT up for PUBLIC DEBATE nor would we want LAWS to take away her request. It was a PRIVATE FAMILY MATTER and that is the way it MUST stay.

6 posted on 01/17/2011 11:49:07 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson