Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dead

In our situation there was nothing of value to inherit.

“Like when rich old comatose grandma may or may not be in pain and needs expensive treatments that are eating into the inheritance. “

The GOVERNMENT should have NO SAY on when a life ends. That is up to the individual who is suffering and hopefully wishes were made known BEFORE they were ill.

If you believe the GOVERNMENT will NOT push for DEATH under ALL circsumstance, “dead” you are not being realitic. This will take away INDIVIDUAL WISHES and make it a one size fits all FINAL solution. We DO NOT want that in the U.S..


15 posted on 01/17/2011 12:43:53 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: nmh
The GOVERNMENT should have NO SAY on when a life ends.

One of the most important and proper roles of government is preventing the unjust and unlawful termination of life.

That is up to the individual who is suffering and hopefully wishes were made known BEFORE they were ill.

They often have not made their wishes known, or the family has different interpretations of those wishes.

Say the doctors believe the patient is unaware but not in pain - one child says she wants to die and the other child says she doesn't. If not the law (government), who makes the decision?

Of course these are proper issues for public debate and policy.

16 posted on 01/17/2011 1:46:46 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson