Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beagle8U

“Final point, it costs big bucks to ever take a case to the USSC, how does a non-dealer, living in low rent housing, come up with that kind of cash?”

I think you’ve got it backwards.

If I read this correctly,he appealed and the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled the entry was unlawful.

I think the State is taking it to SCOTUS.

“When the case reached the Kentucky Supreme Court, however, that court ruled that there was no “exigent circumstance” and, even if there was, the police couldn’t use that as an excuse because their actions created the “circumstance” in the first place. Said the court, “


14 posted on 01/17/2011 7:19:23 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Bigh4u2
Ok, I missed that fact.

It still doesn't explain how he had the money to appeal all the way to the state SC.

I still think the guy was in fact a drug dealer himself, and there are better cases to take to the USSC on the ‘no warrant’ issue.

20 posted on 01/17/2011 8:44:01 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson