Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Castlebar

Wiki sez:
The proclamation did not cover the 800,000 slaves in the slave-holding border states of Missouri, Kentucky, West
Virginia, Maryland or Delaware, which were Union states; slaves there were freed by separate state and federal actions.

The state of Tennessee had already mostly returned to Union control, so it also was not named and was exempted.

Virginia was named, but exemptions were specified for the 48 counties that were in the process of forming West Virginia, as well as seven other named counties and two cities.

Also specifically exempted were New Orleans and 13 named parishes of Louisiana, all of which were also already mostly under Federal control at the time of the Proclamation.


101 posted on 01/15/2011 6:58:06 PM PST by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Repeal The 17th
The Union Slave holding states, and the specified counties of slave holding states of Virginia and Louisiana, were exempted. The Union-controlled areas of all other slaveholding states, including Tennessee, and yes, Arlington, Virginia, were not exempted,and the Emancipation Proclamation did legally free those slaves.

I rather suspect that this was not the cause of Lee's delay; rather, until the victory at Fredericksburg had knocked the Army of the Potomac back on its heels for a few months, General Lee had bigger fish to fry than dealing with his Father-in-Law's final wishes.

I only wanted to point out that Lee was neither a cruel plantation owner, nor a pro-manumition humanitarian. He was a career military man.

103 posted on 01/15/2011 7:16:25 PM PST by Castlebar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson