Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KoRn
So... What exactly IS “handgun ammunition” in their definition?

That unconstitutional vagueness is central to the only remaining lawsuit challenging AB962. More details here.

33 posted on 01/13/2011 10:33:02 PM PST by Redcloak (What's your zombie plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Redcloak
"any firearm with a frame or receiver that actually made before Jan. 1, 1899 is legally "antique" and not considered a "firearm" under Federal law."

How cool is that for tens of thousands of 30-30's?

38 posted on 01/13/2011 10:42:00 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

The CA law is unconstitutional because it imposes an undue burden on the inter-state delivery services DHL, Fed-EX and UPS. The US Supreme Court struck down an analogous Maine law that prohibited the inter-state delivery of cigarettes in Rowe Vs New Hampshire Motor Transport.

The state cannot regulate inter-state activity and its also prohibited from doing that by the US Constitution. CA went too far and I expect the law to be voided by the courts.


44 posted on 01/13/2011 10:47:55 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson