1) Rule of Definition: Define the term or words being considered and then adhere to the defined meanings.
2) Rule of Usage: Dont add meaning to established words and terms. What was the common usage in the cultural and time period. When the passage was written?
3) Rule of Context: Avoid using words out of context. Context must define terms and how words are used.
4) Rule of Historical background: Dont separate interpretation and historical investigation.
5) Rule of Logic: Be certain that words as interpreted agree with the overall premise.
6) Rule of Precedent: Use the known and commonly accepted meanings of words, not obscure meanings for which there is no precedent.
7) Rule of Unity: Even though many documents may be used there must be a general unity among them.
8) Rule of Inference: Base conclusions on what is already known and proven or can be reasonably implied from all known facts.
What does Rule 6 add to Rule 2?
“with eliminationist rhetoric that lies behind the rising tide of violence”
I had to look up what was meant by “eliminationist,” and can find no direct connection to it with violence. Just more hazy notions of a poisoned culture/environment/aura/climate/etc. of “hate.”