To: Presbyterian Reporter
Nope, that was Romney's only statement...my candidate is Gingrich, and he was quite "vocal"...lol...
excerpt
GINGRICH: Look, I think its amazing that people who cannot bring themselves to connect any kind of radical Islamist ideology to the 126 people whove been indicted in the United States plotting terrorism, people who would immediately scream about ethnic profiling, people who on the left have every possible incentive to never allow any one to draw conclusions, suddenly say things that are just factually untrue. Theres no evidence that I know of, that this person was anything except nuts. Certainly, the books that he had in his library tended to be left wing, much more Marxist and communist
Yet on the left the very people who scream if you tell the truth about American Islamists, as I did in our movie America at Risk, turn around and say oh let me draw the worst possible comparison because it makes me feel better
To leap for that, the way the New York Times and others have and the sheriff have, is ridiculous. What proof does the sheriff have?
415 posted on
01/12/2011 10:34:39 AM PST by
magritte
("There are moments, Jeeves, when one asks oneself "Do trousers matter?")
To: magritte
Thanks for posting Newt’s comments on how the leftist media and politicians are libeling conservatives.
I have noticed Pawlenty has been wishy-washy.
To: magritte; Presbyterian Reporter; xzins; P-Marlowe; wmfights
If Newt Gingrich is nominated, you can kiss the Oval Office good-bye for another four years.
Please, no Bob Dole Part Deux.
No nomination is owed to these elder Republican statesmen. They can serve in cabinets and policy positions. But to beat Obama it will take someone who is younger, faster and hopefully, without three marriages to his discredit.
424 posted on
01/12/2011 10:46:21 AM PST by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson