[Carling]

This thread has been hijacked by three posters (wtc911, CharlesWayneCT, and somebody with an ‘R’ starting their screen name) repeating the same thing over and over about “blood libel” to try and distract from Mrs. Palin’s larger (and accurate) message. Basically, they are acting exactly like the Dems/MSM act when they get their asses handed to them on a platter, which is what Palin just served.

I'm not a big fan of Palin, and have been accused of being a “Palin Hater” more than once on this board, but after reading other accounts of “blood libel”, and taking into consideration how I have heard it used recently, I find the criticisms boring, pedantic, and derived from a linear way of thinking. Did it originate in reference toward Jews? Sure. Has it been used in recent years in a more secular context? Sure ... but these 3 posters, and the MSM, aren't going to allow that to stop them from making the video about them, and not about what Palin said as a larger point.

[Happy Rain]

touche’

[Presbyterian Reporter]

Well stated

[tomkat]

Precisely

My reply to r9 et al in #283 above highlights what seems to be a collective naivete and/or collusion to the detriment of the larger goal.

(or they could just be engaged in some coincidentally simultaneous preening  ;-)

---

.. They certainly want to destroy her politically. But they don't want her "dead."

Wanna bet ?!