FWIW, I have heard a very convincing argument from a forensic expert that OJ wasn’t the killer, but his son, Jason, was & the old man was just trying to take the heat for the kid.
Yes, it's from the book/documentary
OJ Is Guilty, But Not Of Murder by William Dear. I find it fairly compelling. Among the points:
Jason was emotionally disturbed and prone to violent outbursts - and had gone off his meds
Jason was upset at Ron and Nicole, one reason was because they failed to deliver on a promise to eat at the restaurant where he was cooking that night
Jason was known to carry a knife
His DNA would have also pointed to OJ, unless very specific tests were done to separate the two
...and a number of other interesting points that provide an equally valid interpretation of the evidence presented against OJ.
Thank you, couldn’t remember the name William Dear. One of the forensic guys I go to school with had Dear come & do a presentation at the school.
Sadly, unless OJ or Jason break down and tell the truth, we’ll never really know what happened.
Clearance rate for murder in the US is only about 62%