[allmendream]

While I agree that the “surveyors marks” “crosshairs” quibble is beside the point and sounds kind of silly (far better to point out that BOTH sides use bullseyes to “target” vulnerable districts) - it is kind of unusual for the “cross hairs” to EXTEND PAST THE DIAMETER OF THE “SCOPE”.

The image used was clearly that of a circle with a vertical and horizontal line that extended well past the circumference of a circle.

I know most liberals have never actually looked down a scope, but let me assure them that it doesn't look like a circle with lines that extend past the circumference of the circle.

[jeltz25]

Exactly, this a clear gun sight right over someone’s photo with all the tell tell marks of a gun sight, the dashes, the circle in the middle, etc... If there was a shirt like with Obama’s photo the purveyor would be immediately arrested and likely sentenced to a long prison term.

The symbol on Pailn’s map was at worst inartful. It does somewhat resemble a scope. Notice I said somewhat. I didn’t see it that way, but I can see where someone might get the idea. Especially if the media constantly reminds them. She’d have been better off using one of those google maps tear drop symbols. Although, the media would accuse her of targeting just the same.