[JohnBrowdie]

if the EPA can regulate a naturally occurring substance like carbon, I see no reason why they can’t regulate/tax sex. or not having sex. or even thinking about having sex.

[Dead Corpse]

...or even thinking about having sex.

Disproportionately affects males.

[thulldud]

if the EPA can regulate a naturally occurring substance like carbon, I see no reason why they can’t regulate/tax sex. or not having sex. or even thinking about having sex.

Don't give them any new ideas. They already got state lotteries, which are a tax on stupid.

Once they have us all "chipped" and registered with our GPS locations, they'll know exactly who's doing it, and even how.

(Unless Laz can help us think up some new "methods" to confuse them.)

[MarkL]

if the EPA can regulate a naturally occurring substance like carbon, I see no reason why they can’t regulate/tax sex. or not having sex. or even thinking about having sex.

A while back, the Missouri state legislature actually outlawed all sexual congress, even between married couples. It was only for a short time, but it's a good example of what governments will do when you aren't watching them like a hawk.

Mark

[billorites]

I suppose you could enjoy favorable tax treatment by having sex inside a Philip Roth IRA.

Your delight will compound tax free until after retirement when you begin to, ahem, withdraw.

[pepperdog]

“even thinking about having sex”

And with that one brilliant statement you have handily solved this Country's debt problem! Congratulations!