Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qbert

http://azdailysun.com/news/local/state-and-regional/article_663d67a8-0e82-569b-a2fe-46306174e1fe.html

The local paper reported this yesterday in the middle of their story. MSM has gone into lockdown over this..........”Dupnik said the suspected shooter has made death threats before and been contacted by law-enforcement officers. The threats weren’t against Giffords, Dupnik said.”..............

Why DRUDGE and Fox are not giving this more airplay I am not sure, but if he made death threats before and the Sheriff’s Office ignored them or just slapped him on the wrist, Dupnik has the blood of these people on his hands, not Sarah Palin of Rush Limbaugh.


2 posted on 01/10/2011 2:01:42 PM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: milwguy

Quite obviously the sheriff didn’t do his job and now is covering by running off his mouth.


3 posted on 01/10/2011 2:03:32 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy

“if he made death threats before and the Sheriff’s Office ignored them or just slapped him on the wrist, Dupnik has the blood of these people on his hands, not Sarah Palin of Rush Limbaugh.”

Indeed.


8 posted on 01/10/2011 2:05:54 PM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy

Calls to the Police Dispatchers are recorded and are data banked as far as I know. Ditto the Dispatchers calling up their records, this is all traceable now. IF I am correct, will they be combing through all these records going back a few years when this young man started to go downhill?


11 posted on 01/10/2011 2:07:21 PM PST by taildragger ((Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy
The threats weren’t against Giffords, Dupnik said.”

Translation: He didn't threaten any of my allies or benefactors. He only threatened the small people.

This is like the new bill being floated by Democrats to make it a crime to use threatening language or symbols AGAINST CONGRESSMEN OR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES?

Why not make it a crime against everyone? I want to be protected against threatening langauge and symbols, too! Wouldn't you?

Why should only the political class be singled out for this kind of protection?

It seems that this sheriff only protects his fellow Democrats or state employees.

-PJ

42 posted on 01/10/2011 3:22:48 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson