Well! That's the truest thing you've posted!
Internet images are NOT NOT NOT legal validation of anything!!!
And...They won't get your kid on a Little League either! :-)
“Internet images are NOT NOT NOT legal validation of anything!!!”
No one really disputes that.
Are you really so out of it that you think anyone has ever said an image on the Internet is acceptable as court documentation? That this self-evident point deserves three capital words and two exclamation points? Have you really missed all the discussions where the most basic evidence of Polarik's fraudulence was his attempt to definitively state that the document was not authentic based on examination of an Internet image only, something no competent forensic document examiner would do?
Obama did not post an image of his COLB on the Internet to provide legal proof of birth. He did it as an informational courtesy for people to whom he is under no legal obligation to prove anything. To believe otherwise is to admit that you are a moron.
Your hysterical repetition of the Little League line is equally stupid. Neither you nor Obama are legally obligated to provide any birth documentation to anyone on the street who asks for it. If you voluntarily chose to join an association that stipulates production of birth certification as a requirement for entry, that's a completely different matter. And an actual COLB would get your kid into most Little Leagues.
Again, if you think realizing that Internet images are not legal documentation makes you clever or insightful, or makes any relevant point in this case, you are mistaken. Your root mistake appears to be confusing your desire to personally see proof of someone else's birth with anyone else's legal obligation to provide it. Sadly for you, Obama's legitimacy as President does not require your personal validation.