Actually, the intellectual content of all of your posts on this entire thread can be boiled down to these three words of yours, lurker.
The factors you blithely pretend do not exist in every iota of your demonstrated position - from the genetic degradations incest verifiable produces and what that means to the children produced (who should be represented somewhere in all this) to the coercive power of parents over their progeny are staggering.
I am somehow doubtful that advocating the legalization and legitimization of incest fits in with the rules and goal of Free Republic. However much it may be a personal desire of yours, it is not and never has been compatible with conservatism.
Well, I see you couldn't debate without turning to a PERSONAL ATTACK.
You have made yourself sound just like the SUBJECT of this article who personally attacked the Conservatives by 'projecting' about their 'wild' behavior, while he was spending nights humping his daughter.
I don't BELIEVE you would do such a thing, but I am THINKING you are using the same tactics he was.
Before you complain about the splinter in L's eye, maybe you should work on the LOG in yours?
I am somehow doubtful that advocating the legalization and legitimization
Legalizing isn't the same as legitimizing. Why don't you go back and reread what I've said on this thread. Feel free to move your lips as you do. I hear that helps with comprehension sometimes.
L