[fr_freak]

Now we’re away from the absurd and back to the plausible risk worth insuraing against. You’re engaging in straw man rhetiric, as if anyone is suggesting that gold is a first choice to have in a crisis, above water, food, guins, ammo, and silver for day to day money.

Listen, buddy, if you're going to jump in on the middle of someone else's conversation, you should at least know what we were talking about. I don't care what YOU were suggesting. The guy I replied to couldn't see a scenario where gold had no value so I gave him one. Period. That guy wasn't you, so kindly untwist your panties.

[Atlas Sneezed]

The guy I replied to couldn’t see a scenario where gold had no value so I gave him one. Period. That guy wasn’t you, so kindly untwist your panties.

---

My panties are just fine. The guy said there was never a ***”TIME”*** when gold had no value. Not a scenario (real, or like yours, absurd).

My only question is that of what personal experience or status of yours makes you so hostile to those who propose or defend the prudent use of precious metals for certain limited purposes?