Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenBagBag

If there was truly any need for a special “anti-bullying” law, then that need existed regardless of and without current media-mantra attention about “bullying” with respect to a single demographic of the population - “gays”.

Yet, prior to this media-mantra issue, cities, towns and schools had at their disposal laws and school regulations to address an issue of a “bully’s” actions crossing the line from mere speech to behavior involving violence, intimidation with violence, stalking, disruption of a classroom, physical assault and many other infractions of law and regulations - WITHOUT ANT SPECIFIC “BULLYING” LAW.

So, let us all NOT be surprised that the language of this New Jersey law demonstrates that for it too the issue IS NOT about being a “bully” it’s about being “gay”; and thus THAT is the focus of the education mandates in the law. Why should we have expected anything less?


3 posted on 01/04/2011 11:08:55 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

Knew an old fellow who interrupted one of his wife’s social gatherings when they started talking about “gay rights”, by reminding them “we are talking about one man blank another man blank blank blank.”

How in hell can that be a subject in kindergarten? To these liberal kooks “gay” is some higher form of spirituality, as is “muslim” or any “minority” (including women who aren’t a minority) or anything “green” (which usually isn’t). It’s not reality it’s just leftist agenda.


7 posted on 01/04/2011 11:17:48 AM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson