[WayneS]

This example of extreme “over analysis” indicates that SOMEONE has WAY too much time on their hands...

[LS]

Well, no. It's an example of the fact that people often do NOT know where Palin stands on key issues. She said she favors border enforcement. Good. Where does she stand on "amnesty?" And if against, why did she support McLame?

What would be so tough about making a Facebook statement about Palin's position on homosexuals in the military?

And am I wrong but wasn't "DADT" a Clinton COMPROMISE with the previous hard line against homosexuals in the military? Why not go back to the old, er, position so to speak?